2003 NECCC Cost Effectiveness through e-Government Awards

National Electronic Commerce Coordinating Council

e-Government Applications for Revenue Maximization and
Cost Avoidance Initiatives in the Public Sector

1. e-Government Project Name:

2. Government Organization Sponsor:

3. Respondent's Name:

4. Title:

5. Email Address:

6. Telephone Number:

7. Government Organization(s) Served:

       Education
       General Government
       Health and Medicaid
       Homeland Defense and Public Security
       Human Resources
       Judicial
       Procurement
       Tax and Revenue
       Other

8. Brief description of project: (200 words or less)

9. Implementation date:

10. How does the system achieve quantifiable revenue increases and/or cost decreases?

Increases to Revenue

       Assessments
       Fees
       Fines
       Grants and reimbursements
       Interest Earned (due to timelier funds deposits)
       Licenses
       Rents
       Sales
       Other (explain)

Cost Savings

       Comparable level of services at reduced cost (demonstrated by budget reduction)
       Increased level of services at reduced incremental cost (budget did not increase as much as normal)
       Application enables agency to reallocate personnel to other areas
       Other (explain)

Cost Containment

       Increased level of services at same cost
       Eliminated or reduced service payment for ineligible recipients, to ineligible service providers, or service beyond program scope
       Other (explain)

11. Provide the quantified annual costs savings or revenue enhancement in dollars and as a percent.

      $               %

12. Do you have a quantitative analysis of the application?       Yes     No

If yes, explain:

13. Are cross-boundary clients/organizations served by the application (e.g., agency in state “A” to agency in state “B”, state to county, county to county, county to municipality, agency to agency (same bureaucracy), program to program, etc)?

Yes No

If yes, explain: